ABOUT GDP ENTERPRISE

We've Been Building Technology Infrastructure Since Before the Internet Changed Everything.

GDP Enterprise traces its roots to 1988, when the business began as Computer Time during the early PC clone revolution.

Our early work included point-of-sale systems and individual PCs. But the technology didn't stand still—and neither did we.

FOUNDER & TECHNICAL HISTORY

Built on Decades of Technical Experience

Terry L. Hines

GDP Enterprise was founded by Terry L. Hines, whose technology career began in 1988 with Computer Time and spans the transition from early business networking through modern enterprise infrastructure, cybersecurity, virtualization, cloud-connected systems, and AI.

His background includes hands-on engineering, technical instruction, infrastructure architecture, project management, and large-scale technology deployment.

Historical credentials and experience include Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE), Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA), and Microsoft Certified Trainer (MCT), along with technical instruction delivered nationally.

Terry later moved into telecommunications and infrastructure project management, leading increasingly complex projects, including programs valued at more than $100 million.

His enterprise experience also includes technology work associated with large-scale mergers and acquisitions, including infrastructure activity surrounding ProBuild's approximately 800 locations.

Enterprise experience doesn't mean every business needs enterprise complexity.

GDP Enterprise applies that experience pragmatically—using the architecture, security, recovery and operational disciplines learned in larger environments without forcing unnecessary complexity onto smaller organizations.

CONTINUOUS EVOLUTION

From individual systems
to enterprise infrastructure.

  1. Computer Time

    PC Systems · Point of Sale · Early Clone Era

  2. 1990s

    Networking

    ARCNET → Novell → TCP/IP

    As computing moved from standalone PCs to connected workgroups, we moved with it. ARCNET gave way to Novell networks. Proprietary networking gave way to TCP/IP. Workgroups became enterprise networks. Servers, communications and infrastructure became increasingly interconnected.

  3. Microsoft Enterprise

    MCSE · Microsoft Certified Trainer

    By 2000, that evolution had moved Terry deeply into Microsoft enterprise technologies. He earned the Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) credential and became a Microsoft Certified Trainer (MCT) in 2000, followed by Cisco CCNA certification in 2001.

  4. Cisco Networking

    CCNA

    That led to teaching and technical engagements across the United States—and eventually to increasingly complex enterprise infrastructure projects.

  5. 2004+

    Telecommunications

    Telecom Infrastructure · Project Management

    By 2004, our work had expanded into telecommunications infrastructure and project management.

  6. Enterprise
    Scale

    Integration

    Large Infrastructure Projects · Multi-Site Environments · M&A Integration

    The scale changed dramatically.

    Experience grew from individual systems and networks into major infrastructure initiatives, including telecommunications projects with values exceeding $100 million.

    At the same time, merger-and-acquisition work introduced another class of engineering challenge: integrating networks, telecommunications, systems and locations while the underlying businesses continued operating.

    GDP Enterprise's experience includes technology integration associated with major mergers and acquisitions and environments involving hundreds of locations across the United States, including work associated with the ProBuild environment.

    Projects at that scale teach lessons that don't come from certification courses.

    Technology is only one part of infrastructure.

    Successful integration requires understanding operations, logistics, communications, risk, people, schedules, vendors, budgets—and what happens when the plan encounters the real world.

  7. Today

    Convergence

    Data Centers · Networking · Satellite · Virtualization · Resilience · AI

OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

There is a difference between knowing how a system is supposed to work and having been responsible for getting it working when it doesn't.

GDP Enterprise brings that operational perspective to engineering.

Systems fail. Networks go down. Hardware breaks. Software vendors change direction. Backups eventually have to become restores. Remote locations lose connectivity. Infrastructure that looked perfectly adequate on a diagram can behave very differently in production.

That experience influences how we design.

  • Reliability.
  • Recoverability.
  • Maintainability.
  • Security.
  • Simplicity.

These aren't features added at the end of a project. They are engineering requirements from the beginning.

CHANGING TECHNOLOGY. CONSTANT PRINCIPLES.

The Technology Keeps Changing. The Engineering Principles Don't.

  1. PCs became networks.
  2. Networks became enterprise infrastructure.
  3. Physical servers became virtual infrastructure.
  4. Data centers became hybrid environments.
  5. Communications expanded from terrestrial networks to increasingly capable satellite systems.
  6. Computing is now entering another transformation through artificial intelligence.

GDP Enterprise continues to evolve with it.

Today our work encompasses:

Data Centers · Enterprise Networking · Telecommunications · Satellite Communications · Virtualization · Cybersecurity & Resilience · Artificial Intelligence

The technologies are dramatically different from what we installed in 1988.

The fundamental questions aren't:

  • What does the organization need to accomplish?
  • How should we engineer it?
  • What happens when something fails?
  • How do we keep it operating?
  • What comes next?
REQUIREMENT FIRST

We Don't Begin With a Product Catalog.

RequirementArchitectureTechnology SelectionImplementationOperations

We begin with the requirement.

What does the system need to accomplish? What happens when something fails? How will it be operated? How will it be recovered? What does it need to become five years from now?

Only then do we determine which technologies belong in the architecture.

That vendor-independent approach allows GDP Enterprise to evaluate established platforms alongside emerging alternatives and engineer infrastructure around the organization's requirements—not a manufacturer's sales strategy.

PERSPECTIVE

Experience Matters.

Nearly four decades in technology provides perspective.

We've seen technologies arrive with enormous promises and disappear a few years later. We've watched dominant vendors become obsolete, new architectures replace established ones, and business decisions completely change the economics of technologies organizations had depended upon for years.

That history is one reason GDP Enterprise remains vendor independent.

THE NEXT CHAPTER

Clint Baxter

A complementary perspective on business and technology.

Clint Baxter brings a complementary perspective to GDP Enterprise: understanding not only how technology works, but how people and businesses work with technology.

His background includes functional business analysis, user experience, service design, workflow improvement, and translating business requirements into practical technical solutions.

That means looking beyond whether a system technically functions. It means examining how employees interact with it, where processes and handoffs break down, what causes repeated frustration, and whether the resulting solution will be understandable and maintainable over time.

This perspective is particularly valuable when work crosses applications, departments or vendors—or when the right answer may involve automation, integration, workflow improvement, an internal tool, or a practical application of AI.

COMBINED POSITIONING

Two Perspectives. One Objective.

GDP Enterprise combines deep hands-on infrastructure and technical experience with business analysis, workflow, user experience, and service-design thinking.

Together, those perspectives allow us to consider both sides of an IT problem:

How does the technology work?

How does the business work?

Because solving the technical symptom isn't always the same thing as solving the business problem.

Understand the business. Engineer the solution. Keep it supportable.

We don't engineer around the product.
We engineer around the requirement.

Discuss a Project